|
"Asking for "Evidences" is a Clear Daleel of Your
Ignorance…"
By
Shaykh Ridhwan Saleem
In the name of Allah. All praise is
for Him, our Lord and Protector, and may peace and mercy be upon
His final prophet.
The following comments are not intended to offend anyone. We love
all our brothers, who love Allah and His messenger (mercy of Allah
and peace be upon him), and are working sincerely for this deen,
no matter which orientation they take. If the following words
are seen to be a little harsh on some, it was in view of the serious
nature of the age we live in that we felt it was time to get to
the point.
The
following brief comment arose as a result of my being asked the
legal ruling on a certain issue. The questioner also wanted to
know the "evidences" for the ruling. I realized that
they intended to compare the "evidences" from different
people they asked and come to their own conclusion as to which
opinion was "strongest".
I
felt that presenting the "evidence" from the Hanafi
legal school on this issue to such a layperson was inappropriate.
I will try and explain why.
I
mentioned the ruling from the Hanafi legal school, and said: Such
a fatwa, if it comes from one of the four legal schools of ahlis-sunnah
wal-jamaa'ah , is the result of the study, research, and ijtihad
of hundreds of the greatest scholars of this ummah, who contributed
to, and revised the legal rulings of each school . They were masters
of the Islamic disciplines, many of whom memorized over one hundred
thousand hadiths of the beloved Prophet (mercy of Allah and peace
be upon him). Many scholars of the Hanafi legal school reached
this respected rank known as 'Guardian ( Hafidh ) of the Hadith'.
In
addition to this they were people of the highest levels of piety
and fear of Allah, which is absolutely confirmed from their biographies.
Therefore we gladly accept the verdicts they gave without having
to question them for their "evidences" , and we do not
turn to those who do not submit to the authority of these great
scholars of this ummah, and want to examine the "evidence"
for every ruling, despite the fact most of them have not even
had a basic training in the Islamic sciences, or even studied
any of the authentic books of hadith with a teacher.
For
such a layperson to ask for "evidence" is ridiculous.
It's like someone who hasn't even studied GCSE science arguing
about the theory of relativity with a professor of physics. Or
like someone who has not even the basic knowledge of biology or
chemistry arguing with a leading physician about which medicine
is better for a particular disease.
Such
a person would be a laughed at! Do you think a professor would
even pay any attention to him?
He wouldn't even waste his time engaging him in a discussion.
Such a person, if he really wishes to give his opinions on theoretical
physics, should first go and study his GCSEs for two years, then
do his A-levels for two years, then get a degree (3 years), then
a masters (1-2 years), then a PhD (3-5 years). Finally, he will
be in a position to begin a discussion with the professor!
Similar,
or worse, is the Muslim who hasn't even studied a basic curriculum
in Islamic Law, and yet steps forward to challenge the greatest
scholars of Law, of the salaf and khalaf of this ummah! He does
not even have the basic tools to understand or evaluate an "evidence".
Do
you think giving opinions on Islamic Law is easier than giving
opinions in theoretical physics?
The
very fact that you ask for "evidence" is itself a clear
daleel of your ignorance of what the process of ijtihad involves.
Do
you think getting an "evidence" is as simple as being
told a verse of Qur'an or a single hadith?
Your job as a layperson or a beginner in the sacred knowledge
is not to ask for the legal rulings on an issue along with "evidences".
Rather, your job is just to ask for the legal rulings alone, from
one of the four accepted legal schools, and to know that the rulings
are based on a deep knowledge and study of the sources.
If
you really are interested in the "evidences" please
step forward to study the sacred knowledge. You are most welcome!
Just to get to a basic level will take at least 5-8 years of serious
study. That's just a basic graduate; you haven't even begun to
specialize yet!
Trust
me, the "evidences" are there for each of the legal
schools. The encyclopaedic reference works which discuss detailed
evidences for the rulings of the Hanafi legal school are numerous
and well-known, written by great masters of Hadith and Jurisprudence.
Please feel free to consult them any time you wish to see the
"evidence" for a legal ruling. But an untrained person,
such as yourself, reading such works will not be able to make
sense of them, like a GCSE science student trying to read advanced
research papers in quantum physics, or cutting-edge medical research.
He'll end up more confused than anything else.
It
is time to be humble. If you are a GCSE student, you need to study
the basics, and accept what your teachers tell you for now. In
many years time, if you are an intelligent student, and put in
lots of hard work, you may be in a position to discuss complicated
theories and form your own opinions.
Unfortunately,
as part of the reprehensible innovations of modern times, a movement
has developed within our ummah which rejects the following of
the four established legal schools , and encourages laypersons
to question every legal ruling, so they can form their own opinions
and forge their own way! (This may well be the sunnah of the American
singer, Frank Sinatra, who sang "I did it my way", but
it certainly isn't the sunnah of the scholars of the salaf .)
If you believe that as a GCSE student you can give opinions on
quantum theory, then ahlan wa sahlan!
You
should be warned however that what you are doing is completely
haraam ie. giving a fatwa/legal ruling directly from the sources
without being qualified to do so. If everyone was automatically
qualified to issue/choose legal rulings, it would lead to disruption
and chaos in the sacred law. (By the way, just because you are
an Arab or speak Arabic doesn't make you an automatically-qualified
mufti either!) All disciplines have curricula and methodologies
for their study. Islamic Law and Juristic Methodology is one of
the most difficult disciplines which takes many years to become
proficient in.
To
become a barrister, for example, you have to get excellent A-level
results, then get a Law degree. Even after that you need to pass
the Bar examinations. Still that is not enough! You then have
to spend a further several years training with a barrister before
you are allowed to practice for yourself. This is merely to become
a junior barrister! After that how many years of continuing research
and experience are required for one to become a QC, or a high-court
judge?
Strange
then it is that every Tom, Dick and Hamza from our ummah considers
himself qualified to issue Islamic legal rulings after reading
a few verses of Qur'an and a summarized version of al-Saheeh of
al-Bukhari! It is a reflection of our deep ignorance of what it
is we are dealing with. You haven't even entered Law school and
you want to pass legal judgements!
You
are a GCSE science student and you want to enter a discussion
between professors!
Be
humble! If you want to discuss issues of Islamic Law, go and sit
at the feet of the scholars, the inheritors of the prophets (may
peace be upon them), and study with them. Learn from their good
character as well as their knowledge, purify yourself, so that
you may become a worthy recipient of the light that is the sacred
knowledge.
If
you have spent your life studying engineering or medicine, or
pursuing business ventures, instead of seeking the sacred knowledge,
and now, in your older age, you have decided to get a bit "religious",
start coming to the masjid, and so on, please don't think you
can do a "crash course" in the deen by reading "Fiqh
us-Sunnah" or the Tafseer of Mawdudi, and come to a level
where you can debate with the scholars. Please leave the matters
of the deen to those who actually did spend their youth and sacrifice
many years of their lives to the study of the sacred disciplines.
As
one of my teachers often says: " this is the deen, not teen
(fig)!! " This is the teaching of Islam that you are dealing
with! It's not the plaything of every common person. It is our
western conditioning that makes everyone arrogant enough to believe
they can give their opinions on all issues, from theology to Islamic
Law.
The plain truth is you are not in any position to evaluate "evidences"
for a legal ruling and come to a conclusion for yourself as to
which opinion is the "strongest".
I
remember once entering a discussion with an 18 year old, clean-shaven
youth, dressed in jeans and a leather jacket, outside my local
masjid. He had started practicing two years previously. He was
quite soberly explaining to me how he examines the "evidences"
put forward by the different legal schools on each "issue"
and then is able to conclude for himself which is the strongest
opinion! The fact that he didn't know a word of Arabic was not
enough to deter his scholastic pursuits – he would get everything
translated into English of course!
Unfortunately,
such poor brothers have no idea of how complicated many legal
rulings are, and how extensive the discussions between the legal
schools on each issue can be. Don't they realize that they are
merely "blindly following" whichever "scholar"
has presented to them the information on this particular "issue".
They haven't even checked the sources themselves, e.g. the reference
books of the four legal schools, to see what they say in their
discussion on the issue. It is well known that you cannot take
Hanafi rulings from a Shafa'i text, or vice versa, because they
often give inaccurate presentations of another legal school –
you have to go to the texts of the school itself.
I
will just give you one simple, commonly-seen, example where the
poor brother/sister thinks that they have done a great "ijtihad",
and come to their "own" conclusions on an issue (having
realized that all the four legal schools got it wrong for the
last 1,424 years). This is the issue of where to place the hands
in the prayer. It is quite usual now to see Muslims praying while
placing their hands on their chests or necks rather than the traditional
above-or-below the navel position, which was the practice of the
Muslims for over a thousand years until recent times. Indeed all
four legal schools agree that the hands should be just above or
below the navel – definitely not on the chest (except for
women in the Hanafi school), and especially not on the neck! (Some
of the Maliki's hold that the sunnah is to place the hands at
the sides).
However
the young mujtahids of the 21st century know better. Obviously
all those great legal experts of the four schools didn't have
access to " Fiqh us-Sunnah ", that essential guide for
all budding mujtahids! It's even available in a handy translated
version for non-Arabic mujtahids! You simply flick open the relevant
chapter on: "Sunnah acts of prayer, The Position of the Hands"
(vol.1 p.132) and you will discover that al-Tirmidhi narrates
a hadith that the Prophet (mercy of Allah and peace be upon him)
prayed with his hands on his chest, and that al-Tirmidhi grades
this hadith "as hassan". Also you will read that a similar
hadith is found in "The Saheeh" of Ibn Khuzayma, and
that Ibn Khuzayma "considers it as sahih".
That's
it! The young mujtahid has done his job! Obviously there are sahih
hadiths about this! (Don't know who that Ibn Khuzayma guy is…but
he sounds important!) The four legal schools got it all wrong!
Thereafter the brother is seen in the local masjid placing his
hands high up on his chest, looking rather scornfully at those
who "blindly" follow the legal schools.
Now
let's have a closer look at the "evidences" given above
in "Fiqh us-Sunnah". We make some startling discoveries.
First
of all, those who actually studied "al-Jaami'" of al-Tirmidhi
itself would realise that al-Tirmidhi does NOT even mention a
hadith that the Prophet (mercy of Allah and peace be upon him)
prayed with his hands on his chest! Let alone grade it as hassan!!
A very serious mistake on the part of the author of "Fiqh
us-Sunnah".
Second
major mistake: although Ibn Khuzayma (may Allah have mercy on
him) does mention a hadith of the Prophet (mercy of Allah and
peace be upon him) placing his hands on his chest, he DOES NOT
consider it to be saheeh. In fact Ibn Khuzayma makes no comment
on the authenticity of the hadiths that he narrates in his book.
But those who know Ibn Khuzayma's methodology will see that all
indications are that he did not consider this narration as sound.
First of all he does not mention placing the hands on the chest
in the chapter heading of that chapter (which is his usual method
of indicating his understanding of the legal implications of the
narrations in the chapter). Secondly, he places the narration
at the end of the chapter, which also indicates its weakness.
Anyhow,
a look at the chain of narrators of this hadith will show that
it contains Mu'ammal ibn Isma'il, who most scholars of hadith
say is a weak narrator, pointing out that he had a terrible memory!
Imam al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) actually says he
is "munkar al-hadith", meaning his hadith are totally
rejected! There are also further criticisms of this narration
possible but we will not delve into these right now.
Now
we see the problem. The young mujtahid was not really a mujtahid
after all! He was the worst type of "blind follower"
. He read a chapter from "Fiqh us-Sunnah" and accepted
what he read "blindly", all the while thinking that
he had done a great ijtihad! Imagine how many more mistakes this
book contains. And it is one of the most popular books nowadays
amongst Muslims! The type of mistakes pointed out above are serious
errors. One of my teachers said that these are not the type of
slips you would see sometimes in the writings of scholars. Rather
they indicate a real ignorance in the author that is inexcusable.
At
the end of the day, the reality is that you are a muqallid, whether
you know it or not . The choice simply remains as to whom you
follow: is it going to be the author of "Fiqh us-Sunnah",
or al-Albaani, or one on the four legal schools. In the end, studying
evidences for legal rulings is not wrong in itself, but it has
a certain context and place.
Other
comments may be made regarding these matters, but we will suffice
with what has been stated, praying to Allah that He covers us
all in His mercy and guides us to the truth in all matters, and
enables us to follow it, and act according to what pleases Him
at all times. And may peace and the mercy of Allah be upon His
beloved messenger, his family, and all his companions. And all
praise is to Allah, Lord of the Worlds.
Written
by,
servant of the sacred knowledge,
Ridhwan ibn Muhammad Saleem.
Damascus , Ramadhan 1424 H
Further reading:
1.
"Refutation of those who follow other than the four legal
schools" ("radd 'ala man ittaba'a ghayr al madhahib
al arba'ah"), by Imam Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali (Arabic)
2.
"Non-madhhabism: The most dangerous innovation threatening
the Islamic Law" ("La madhhabiyyah: akhtar al-bid'ah
tohaddidu al-sharee'ah al-islamiyyah"), by Shaykh Dr. Muhammad
Sa'eed Ramadhan al-Bouti (Head of the dept. of Sharee'ah, University
of Damascus )(Arabic)
3.
"The legal status of following a madhhab", by Justice
Shaykh Taqi 'Uthmani (Chief Qadi of Pakistan ) (English)
4.
"The Four Madhhabs", by Shaykh Abdul-Hakeem Murad (English)
5.
"Benefits of the sciences of jurisprudence" ("fawaa'id
'uloom al-fiqh"), introduction to "'ilaa ul-
sunan", by Shaykh Kayranwi (Arabic)
6.
"Meaning of the saying of the Muttalibi Imam: 'If a hadith
is authentic, then it is my madhhab'", ("ma'na qawl
al-imam al-muttalib: itha sahha al-hadith fa huwa madhhabi"),
by Shaykh ul-Islam, Imam Taqi ul-Deen al-Subki (Arabic)
7.
"Fatwa Concerning the Obligation of Following Rightly Guided
Scholars", by Shaykh Murabit al-Haajj and Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
(Arabic/English)
|